Finding: Detailed review required
Status: ReviewExact page: Decision SheetTrust through review
Trust starts with evidence— not confidence.
MESTRE shows the page behind each verified finding and keeps open questions visible.
Review exportDecision Sheet
Project
Central Library Renewal Project
City of Westbridge · Tender CL-26-1847
Review statusDetailed review required2 items need verification
4files organized
1addendum incorporated
6pricing items
1missing document
Finding: Partial · 14 of 18 documents reviewed
Status: ReviewExact page: Package indexFinding: Addendum 1 incorporated
Status: VerifiedExact page: Addendum 1 · p. 2Finding: 6 supplied items imported from Excel
Status: VerifiedExact page: Pricing Workbook · rows 5–10Finding: Contract Drawing Book
Status: MissingExact page: Tender Document · p. 52Finding: July 3, 2026 · 11:30 a.m.
Status: VerifiedExact page: Tender Document · p. 1Finding: October 2, 2026
Status: VerifiedExact page: Tender Document · p. 7Finding: Verify against SSP 599S05
Status: VerifyExact page: Tender Document · p. 9Evidence & exact pages3 references shown
Closing date and submission requirements
p. 3 · lines 12–18Bond requirement
p. 15 · lines 3–96 supplied pricing items
rows 5–10Four product principles
A useful answer must remain reviewable.
These principles define how MESTRE should communicate what it found and what still needs a person.
Source before assertion
A supported finding should lead back to the tender package—not stop at a generated answer.
Uncertainty stays visible
A questionable finding should be reviewed, corrected, or rejected—not presented as certainty.
The package is authoritative
Tender documents, issued addenda, and the official pricing schedule take precedence over MESTRE’s interpretation.
A person decides
MESTRE supports professional review. It does not autonomously decide whether a contractor should bid.
Capability boundaries
What MESTRE can say—and what it cannot.
Clear boundaries are more valuable than overconfident product language.
MESTRE can
“surface a requirement found in this part of the package.”
MESTRE cannot
“promise that the package contains no other relevant requirement.”
MESTRE can
“flag a referenced document that appears to be missing.”
MESTRE cannot
“promise that the tender package is complete or risk-free.”
MESTRE can
“extract quantities and pricing items supplied in the schedule.”
MESTRE cannot
“claim that those quantities were measured from construction drawings.”
MESTRE can
“provide a supervised review recommendation.”
MESTRE cannot
“make the final bid/no-bid decision.”
How to review a finding
Four checks before it enters the working record.
- 01Read the finding
Understand what MESTRE believes may affect the tender.
- 02Open the source
Open the page that supports the finding.
- 03Check later addenda
Confirm whether the requirement was changed or replaced.
- 04Confirm or correct
The estimator decides what enters the Decision Sheet.
Review exportDecision Sheet
Project
Central Library Renewal Project
City of Westbridge · Tender CL-26-1847
Review statusDetailed review required2 items need verification
4files organized
1addendum incorporated
6pricing items
1missing document
Finding: Detailed review required
Status: ReviewExact page: Decision SheetFinding: Partial · 14 of 18 documents reviewed
Status: ReviewExact page: Package indexFinding: Addendum 1 incorporated
Status: VerifiedExact page: Addendum 1 · p. 2Finding: 6 supplied items imported from Excel
Status: VerifiedExact page: Pricing Workbook · rows 5–10Finding: Contract Drawing Book
Status: MissingExact page: Tender Document · p. 52Finding: July 3, 2026 · 11:30 a.m.
Status: VerifiedExact page: Tender Document · p. 1Finding: October 2, 2026
Status: VerifiedExact page: Tender Document · p. 7Finding: Verify against SSP 599S05
Status: VerifyExact page: Tender Document · p. 9Evidence & exact pages3 references shown
Closing date and submission requirements
p. 3 · lines 12–18Bond requirement
p. 15 · lines 3–96 supplied pricing items
rows 5–10See the boundary in practice
Follow the finding back to the package.
The walkthrough shows how intake, exact pages, open questions, and confirmation fit together.